Court Locations| Case Number | Opinion Summary ( date sorted) |
|---|---|
|
Nancy V. Alquist 08-17638 In re Boben |
Aug 30, 2010 Analyzing projected disposable income in accordance with section 1325 (b) of the Bankruptcy Code in accordance with BAPCPA amendments. |
|
Nancy V. Alquist 08-00557 Roberson v. Ford Motor Credit, LLC |
Mar 29, 2010 After the Court decided it was appropriate to certify an ipso facto default issue in a car loan to the Court of Appeals of Maryland, Ford Motor Credit asserted that it had a right to arbitrate. The Court denied the arbitration demand as untimely and because it conflicted with an aspect of bankruptcy law. |
|
Nancy V. Alquist 04-11677 Scott D. Field v. Benjamin L. Bryant |
Aug 03, 2005 Trustee permitted to sell real estate, but joint tenant entitled to contribution |
|
Nancy V. Alquist 04-10326 GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL LENDING, INC. VS. VIRGINIA J. |
Aug 01, 2005 Denying Motion for SJ |
|
Nancy V. Alquist 10-12205 In re Thomas Michael Toggas |
Jun 03, 2001 Chapter 13 Trustee filed Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Qualify. Largest claim in this matter was for a judgment for injury and punitive damages from a state court in South Carolina. Debtor alleged that because the claim was listed as disputed on his schedules, it did not count for Chapter 13 eligibility purposes. Debtor had filed no formal objection to the claim filed by the creditor but merely attacked the Proof of Claim in the context of defending against the Trustee's Motion to Dismiss. The Court found the Creditors claim to be both liquidated and noncontingent by virtue of the South Carolina judgment, brought before the court in the form of a triple-seal, exemplified copy. In following In re Stern, 266 B.R. 322, the Court agreed that claims labeled as disputed by a debtor for purposes of their schedules are still used in the computation when determining a debtor's Chapter 13 eligibility. |